What is your opinion about established vs. free citizen-built encyclopedias such as Wikipedia? Consider how information environments are evolving and also think about the challenges for developing information literacy skills.
After reading the articles “Can We Make Peace With Wikipedia” by Chris Harris and “Wikipedia and Britannica -- The Kid’s All Right (And So’s the Old Man)” by Paula Berinstein I came to have a better understanding of the service that Wikipedia and other citizen-built encyclopedias can provide. I did not realize the editing process in which the Wikipedia site adheres to and even though misinformation may occur within the on-line encyclopedias, eventually there are reviewers that will catch it and correct it. Information environments are definitely changing at a rapid pace and the popularity of Wikipedia cannot be denied. I agree with Chris Harris when he says, “It would be much more productive to teach colleagues, students and parents how to best use Wikipedia. Instead of appearing to be ‘behind the times’ when it comes to new information sources…if we can’t beat’em let’s join’em – as leaders in promoting the proper use of Wikipedia.” (Harris, 2007, p.26) As many others have said these types of sites can be a good starting place for beginning your research and getting a general idea about your topic. It is important to confirm the information found here with more reputable sources and this is in itself a great way to teach the students skills in analyzing and thinking more critically when searching for accurate information. Usually teachers will not accept Wikipedia as their only reference sources so students need to broaden their scope and using Wikipedia may actually help them to become familiar with other on-line encyclopedias and information sources. Also Berinstein made a good point when discussing bias within Wikipedia and Britannica and that is that we will find bias everywhere, sometimes even in the most reputable and scholarly published works therefore it is a good place to teach students to keep thinking critically and not to trust everything they read without question.